Sites Holmquist trys, and often fails, to go no more than a couple of days without visiting (some of which Holmquist regularly swipes links from without attribution)
Yesterday Ken Layne made two very weak arguments about Ralph Nader. One entry called Nader's 2000 run a "shameful presidential campaign" apparently for the very fact that Nader ran. I guess democracy and dissenting views aren't acceptable to Layne. The other incorrectly accuses famed consumer advocate of alledging a conspiracy in NBA officiating even though he has done no such thing.
I've commented on both posts but received no substantial response, let alone anything approaching a rebuttal.